|Author:||Mchugh, A. D. ; Bhattarai, S. ; Lotz, G. ; Midmore, D. J.|
|Book Group Author:||NA|
Subsurface drip irrigation can reduce off-farm movements of fertilizers and pollutants and improve the water use efficiency of irrigated agriculture. Here we compared the effects of furrow and subsurface drip at different irrigation rates, based on a percentage of daily crop-evapotranspiration rates (ETc), on run-off and off-site movement of suspended sediment, nutrients and pesticides from cotton crops grown on a vertisol. Our results show that furrow irrigation significantly increased suspended soil loss, of 5.26 t ha-1, compared to that of subsurface drip irrigation at 120% of ETc, of 2.53 t ha-1, whereas no erosion was recorded with deficit subsurface drip irrigation. Off-site movement of nitrogen in furrow, of 18.63 kg ha-1, was five times greater than subsurface drip irrigation at 120% ETc. It was much less with 105% ETc (0.37 kg ha-1) and 90% ETc (0.15 kg ha-1), and absent for 75% and 50% of ETc. Phosphorus loss from furrow, of 778 g ha-1, was greater than for the wetter subsurface drip treatments that gave 23 g ha-1 for 90% ETc and 19 g ha-1 for 120% ETc. No P loss was recorded from drier subsurface drip irrigation rates. Herbicides such as atrazine and diuron were applied in the year prior to the experiment, but considerable amounts were recorded in furrow run-off in both years, but only at 90 and 120% ETc subsurface drip irrigation in the first year. Concentrations of applied herbicide residues in the runoff exceeded the minimum threshold level for 99% species protection and, although the total amount of herbicide movement was higher in furrow, at times the concentration was greater for wetter subsurface drip irrigation run-off. Residues of insecticides, such as endosulphan applied in a previous year and dimethoate applied in the current years, were recorded in runoff from subsurface drip at 120% and furrow irrigation. Their concentrations in each year exceeded minimum threshold level. Subsurface drip irrigation at 75% ETc offered the best trade-off between off-site run-off, erosion and pesticide movement and yield and water use efficiency.
|Pages:||507 - 519|
|Journal:||Agronomy for Sustainable Development|
atrazine, cotton, crop yield, dimethoate, diuron,endosulfan, erosion, evapotranspiration, furrow irrigation, herbicideresidues, herbicides, insecticide residues, insecticides, nitrogenfertilizers, pesticides, phosphorus fertilizers, plant water relations,runoff, sediment, soil types, subsurface irrigation, trickle irrigation,Vertisols, water use efficiency, Gossypium, Gossypium hirsutum,Gossypium, Malvaceae, Malvales, dicotyledons, angiosperms,Spermatophyta, plants, eukaryotes, DCMU, phosphate fertilizers,weedicides, weedkillers, Field Crops (FF005) (New March 2000), PlantWater Relations (FF062), Plant Production (FF100), Pesticide and DrugResidues and Ecotoxicology (HH430) (New March 2000), Soil Chemistry andMineralogy (JJ200), Fertilizers and other Amendments (JJ700), Soil WaterManagement (Irrigation and Drainage) (JJ800) (Revised June 2002)[formerly Soil Water Management], Erosion; Soil and Water Conservation(PP400)